|
Post by JJ Watt on Jul 28, 2010 10:26:09 GMT -5
Hi guys!
|
|
|
Post by Chromeo on Jul 28, 2010 10:28:40 GMT -5
Heya... What's up? (Also, you're standing on a link to Israel news. Just move your... yup, there you go.)
|
|
|
Post by JJ Watt on Jul 28, 2010 10:33:20 GMT -5
.____.
|
|
|
Post by JJ Watt on Jul 28, 2010 10:38:18 GMT -5
I didn't read anything in the topic, I just saw that you posted today, clicked on the topic, and said hi.
|
|
Tails82
Lord of Terror++
Loyal Vassal
still...sipping?
Posts: 34,348
|
Post by Tails82 on Jul 28, 2010 11:25:41 GMT -5
|
|
Tails82
Lord of Terror++
Loyal Vassal
still...sipping?
Posts: 34,348
|
Post by Tails82 on Jul 28, 2010 13:30:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Chromeo on Jul 28, 2010 13:31:35 GMT -5
God bless America?
|
|
Tails82
Lord of Terror++
Loyal Vassal
still...sipping?
Posts: 34,348
|
Post by Tails82 on Jul 28, 2010 13:50:26 GMT -5
Where bills passed by democratically-elected officials can be blocked by a single activist judge.
|
|
Tails82
Lord of Terror++
Loyal Vassal
still...sipping?
Posts: 34,348
|
Post by Tails82 on Jul 28, 2010 16:30:18 GMT -5
Obama will not be attending the boy scout's national jamboree. Rather than pay a visit to the scouts on their hundredth year, he's doing more important things like going on The View and attending another fundraising dinner.
|
|
|
Post by Laharls_Wrath on Jul 28, 2010 16:45:46 GMT -5
Obama's a douchebag /discussion
|
|
Tails82
Lord of Terror++
Loyal Vassal
still...sipping?
Posts: 34,348
|
Post by Tails82 on Jul 28, 2010 17:31:42 GMT -5
|
|
Tails82
Lord of Terror++
Loyal Vassal
still...sipping?
Posts: 34,348
|
Post by Tails82 on Jul 30, 2010 14:29:16 GMT -5
www.nytimes.com/2010/07/30/opinion/30fri1.html?_r=2Earlier this year, the administration successfully pushed for crucial provisions of the Patriot Act to be renewed for another year without changing a word. Voters had every right to expect the president would roll back authority that had been clearly abused, like national security letters. But instead of implementing reasonable civil liberties protections, like taking requests for e-mail surveillance before a judge, the administration is proposing changes to the law that would allow huge numbers of new electronic communications to be examined with no judicial oversight.Hypocrisy detected.
|
|
Parappa
New Member
OBJECTION!
Posts: 29
|
Post by Parappa on Jul 30, 2010 17:46:54 GMT -5
Where bills passed by democratically-elected officials can be blocked by a single activist judge. speaking as a non-American, the bill was stupid in the first place. it just encourages racial profiling and even though it's illegal to racial profile in the bill, how else are the officers going to tell if someone is illegal or not...
|
|
Tails82
Lord of Terror++
Loyal Vassal
still...sipping?
Posts: 34,348
|
Post by Tails82 on Jul 31, 2010 0:31:27 GMT -5
I spose if someone were pulled over they'd work down from there upon the driver's failure to show a valid license. It's not like the average cop is going to suspect every Hispanic person, there's a sizeable amount of em who are legal citizens...
|
|
Parappa
New Member
OBJECTION!
Posts: 29
|
Post by Parappa on Jul 31, 2010 17:27:57 GMT -5
but they shouldn't be pulled over in the first place, they've done nothing wrong. you shouldn't be interfered by the law unless you're breaking it...
|
|