|
|
Post by Chromeo on Jan 3, 2010 17:18:05 GMT -5
Should Yaydude have been invited?
Yaydude, you're obviously not allowed to vote >_>
Yes or No.
Yes:
NitroChrome
Tails82
Game Master
The_Wave
No:
Laharl's_Wrath
|
|
|
|
Post by Laharls_Wrath on Jan 3, 2010 17:19:15 GMT -5
I wanted to wait and run it by everyone, give it time and thought
you just asked me and tails and then invited him
|
|
Tails82
Lord of Terror++
Loyal Vassal
still...sipping?
Posts: 34,371
|
Post by Tails82 on Jan 3, 2010 17:19:35 GMT -5
I have agreed with many if not all of Nitro's past statements.
|
|
|
|
Post by Laharls_Wrath on Jan 3, 2010 17:22:29 GMT -5
You didn't even run it by Wave and Ferret! At the very least you should have asked us four
You wanted him here so you invited him
There is a good chance you acted so rapidly because you feared others would disagree
|
|
|
|
Post by Chromeo on Jan 3, 2010 17:27:01 GMT -5
No, it's because I couldn't be bothered to wait, because it wasn't a huge decision, and the opportunity could be gone. Ferret probably would have voted with you, but I'm pretty sure Wave would have voted with me, so it would still be a "Yes" victory...
|
|
|
|
Post by Laharls_Wrath on Jan 3, 2010 17:28:37 GMT -5
VOTES ARENT THE FUCKING ANSWER
PEOPLE VOTE WITHOUT FUCKING THINKING
THEY ACT TOO GOD DAMN HASTILY
YOU CANT JUST ASSUME A VOTE WILL PRODUCE AN IDEAL OUTCOME, IT IS FOOLISH
THINGS MUST BE THOUGHT OVER, AND I DONT SEE ANYONE ELSE THINKING
|
|
|
|
Post by Laharls_Wrath on Jan 3, 2010 17:30:57 GMT -5
you cannot simply vote, and count all votes as equal
how could an ignorant vote be equal to a well thought out one?
|
|
|
|
Post by yay6kingralis on Jan 3, 2010 17:31:01 GMT -5
im all for the negatory
|
|
|
|
Post by Laharls_Wrath on Jan 3, 2010 17:31:49 GMT -5
the more you rush things the more voting people do ignorantly, the more things go to hell
|
|
|
|
Post by yay6kingralis on Jan 3, 2010 17:32:08 GMT -5
and as for laharls, a well thought out vote is not necessarily greater than an ignorant one
|
|
|
|
Post by Chromeo on Jan 3, 2010 17:32:22 GMT -5
Just because we dont have to take a weekend out to decide simple things doesn't mean we don't think about them. And who gave you the right to "think" for all of us?
Also : quit getting so irate. Damn.
|
|
|
|
Post by Laharls_Wrath on Jan 3, 2010 17:36:53 GMT -5
you keep saying I'm "thinking" for all of you? HOW SO
I'm merely trying to hold you all back
I didnt tell you you couldnt invite him, I said to wait
This way perhaps it could be discussed before all of us? But no, you use your bullshit vote as an excuse, act as rapidly as possible, and then cry out victory for democracy
this is all bullshit
as for voting, I only believe a valid vote can be held after a well thought out discussion, you think otherwise? I dont see how people can make a PROPER decision without all of the information at hand and time to consider it all from several viewpoints
|
|
|
|
Post by thewave on Jan 3, 2010 17:37:49 GMT -5
You're really asking for problems, Laharl.
And I would say yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chromeo on Jan 3, 2010 17:39:34 GMT -5
Oh please, you weren't waiting so we could vote, you just wanted to decide on your own.
And you're "thinking" for all of us because you think our input is redundant, and you alone have the wisdom to decide.
|
|
|
|
Post by yay6kingralis on Jan 3, 2010 17:40:21 GMT -5
this place reminds me of "where the wild things are"
|
|
Spinning round and round like the deadly hands of a radium clock. 
