Couldn't be bothered to find my mod objections

[Waveon]

Well, that's some vengeance then xD

[Tails82]

TaiIs82 10/14/2018 2:48:58 AM

"They are losing their base."

They're losing practically every law-abiding citizen. That's why Governors McAuliffe, Cuomo went on mass-pardon sprees. Criminals are their base.

www.washingtonexaminer.com/red-alert-politics/shockingly-thanks-to-millennials-republican-party-breaks-ground-game-record

"thanks to millennials, Republican Party breaks ground game record

The Republican National Committee just trained its 25,000th Republican Leadership Initiative Fellow this week, highlighting a growing trend that the Republican party continues to see: Conservative millennials are excited and eager to show their support for the Republican agenda, conservative policies, and candidates through grassroots efforts.

The 25,000 benchmark is nearly double the RNC’s initial goal for the midterm cycle, demonstrating the sheer size and scope of the GOP’s ground game heading towards November. This is five times the number of RLI fellows recruited during the entire 2016 presidential cycle.

“These stats should come as no surprise — young Americans are excited about what President Trump and the Republican Congress have accomplished in just two short years. This excitement, paired with the RNC’s unprecedented level of youth engagement on school campuses, in classrooms, and in communities across the nation, has empowered young conservatives to get involved and make their voices heard,” said Mitch Freckleton, RNC Director of Youth Engagement."

Warned trolling

A Mod/Admin said on 10/14/2018 3:42:02 AM:
"criminals are their base" is a flat out generalizing lie, especially considering you're using it to smear a large swath of the country with.

Currently-acceptable topics include:
- "Obama should've put Bush and all the Republicans in prison"
- "We should burn the Republican party to the ground"

LanHikari10, Life Sympathy, Lord_of_BeefDip, ne14a6t9r, Optimus Magnus, Silent Sniper IV, or stahlbaum: aside from all of you being cowards who don't sign your names to anything, one (or more) of you is extremely biased. Kindly step down and go back to the kiddie table until you're grown up enough to handle different opinions.

[Tails82]

TaiIs82 Posted 10/31/2018 12:26:38 AM
Anyone as opposed to the Nazis as TC claims to be, should be familiar with the concept of scapegoating and Reichstag tactics.

The media is currently, irresponsibly engaging in division and open falsehoods. Activists have staged fake "hate crimes." They intentionally misreport and grandstand on graves in a twisted desire to advance their agenda.

In the midst of all this, through all the calls for kicking and screaming and violence and incivility, our president has stood up for the average commonsense American who has been attacked and so mistreated by the elites for absolutely no reason. Spiritual leaders with open hearts come out and say his presence is welcome. In return they get hit with more attacks and threats.

This country is sick and tired of the media and its lies.

Warned offensive

A Mod/Admin said on 10/31/2018 8:49:59 AM:
Implying these attacks where 'staged' is blatantly offensive.

You said on 11/1/2018 10:35:25 PM:
An "implying" moderation which has no merit, as a mod is assuming something I did not say and would never say.

The past tense is an important thing (I refer not to current attacks). The historical pattern is crucial here, as I'm referring to several instances where the press got it wrong. This includes people like the debunked Rolling Stone stories, Mattress Girl and phony allegations made by people who were found by the police to have filed false reports, drawn swastikas on their own homes, things that are definitively proven to have been staged. My statement would also include the media's narrative surrounding real attacks, but framed falsely or misused for political purposes (e.g. reporting that a shooter belonged to the Tea Party when he did not, cutting a video to make Zimmerman sound more racist, etc). This includes the 92% negative media coverage that even looks at mass shootings and frames it as "how do we use this to get Trump?"

My post, read correctly, is a level-headed appeal against media rhetoric and false, divisive reporting over events which happened, but which activists try to hijack for their own purposes. I did not and would not say that a shooting was staged, but to a mod who hammers away at this stuff all day, every message looks like a nail.

[Tails82]

Typical of the failed socialist programs, the socialists will always blame everyone else aside from themselves.

www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/10/26/hess-addison-common-core-advancing-left-wing-agenda/

When the people behind it are veering off of math topics and into race stuff, you know it's time to pull the plug.

nkl trolling

[Tails82]

Someone on mod staff continues to have a raging hardon for Obama:

Obama has been found marching with the New Black Panthers, called the Rev Wright his mentor for 30 years (he couldn't hide this one since it was in his own book), and has also been caught fraternizing with Farrakhan (this bit of info the press held from us for 13 YEARS).

Sadly, there were multiple times where Obama-Hillary groups were found engaging in violence, most notably the open race riots that went on under his watch - with activists stating they had been bused around. Hillary staffers had to resign after they were caught on tape paying people to beat on Trump supporters (they were reshuffled and promoted later). And Obama has always engaged in political dirty tricks, arguably from day one. His earliest colleges speeches were staged events with "white racists" who were instructed to drag him off the podium at a given time.

From the beginning Obama has stood for extremism and division - the "they bring a knife, you bring a gun" comments. Will the media finally press him to condemn? Or will they continue to defend him for another 13 years?

[Tails82]

So now my account has been suspended because I oppose lynching. You can't make this stuff up!

In a world where so many self-interested politicians and special interests are only out for themselves, it can be refreshing to see someone who truly cares for others put it all on the line even when his own life is at risk.

I'm not mad at the tribe, but I am disgusted by the typical conduct here. A man is dead and people have no problem calling him "crazy" - this would get most anyone suspended if they said the same thing about an LGBT suicide, but since the guy was murdered for his beliefs apparently mods don't care.

These are also the same accounts that would be screaming when other people say they want borders and are against millions of people illegally entering a country. They would be screaming bloody murder if someone from MS-13 gets arrested by a lawful body - not killed, not harmed, but arrested to face justice in an established court of law. At the same time, one guy goes to the wrong place and gets lynched, and these "compassionate" accounts trash the murdered victim while claiming he deserved it.

It just further demonstrates the complete hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy of the far left.

[Tails82]

"What people seem to forget is that we haven't evolved as a species."

Hmmmmmm, what do you think is more likely? That peaceful Europeans will revert to WWII, or that criminal illegal immigrants will suddenly stop breaking laws and fit right in overnight as super-productive members of the community, defying all previous crime statistics and past experience?

Considering the odds, I'm not the one who forgot about human nature here.

"I'd recommend a wait and see approach before you proclaim Italy and Poland as "leaders of a brighter tomorrow"

Well again, the conventional "leaders" of Europe both praised and placed their bets on people who came over but unfortunately ended up running rape gangs, so I'd say my odds are a lot better than theirs.

Warned offensive

gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/1196-better-than-hellhole/77385718

^For all the reasons why a warning off a clean history is harassment. The topic was closed as well for no reason.

gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/261-politics/77376616

As for why it's dumb, here you have a topic where everyone is calling everyone else a fascist - Italians are all fascist, Poland is all fascist, Europe is all going Nazi - and on top of this, the post I'm responding to that condemned all humanity, which like all the other stuff is curiously not a generalization (even though I dunno how you can get a bigger generalization than that). Posts #2 and 15 are especially wacky, but of all these messages only mine was a generalization apparently, my explicit criminal qualifier and statistics be damned.

Although the mod's an anonymous coward as always, considering the exclusive targeting of me, immediate warning, unjustified topic closure, I'm going to go with Error1355 - one of the worst mods on Gamefaqs - if not the worst.

[Tails82]

Ba da da da

You said on 1/13/2019 7:04:07 AM:
Warning off a clean history + closing topic without reason is a sign of mod harassment. If a mod would like to disagree with me that's fine, but he can debate me like everyone else.

Very simple: if it's not a moddable generalization to call entire countries (Italy, Poland, all of Europe) fascist, as posted multiple times, if it's not a generalization to blame all humanity/human nature (the message I was responding to, though I dunno how you get more generalizing than that), if it's not moddable to frequently post conspiracy theories about "white racists" working with Putin to launch nukes, my message against criminal gangs is not a violation. It shouldn't be a moderation at all to oppose criminal gangs, and definitely not a severe one, but here we are.

Gamefaqs mods have a terrible reputation and a lot of people in this situation would already suspect what will happen: the closed-minded mod will uphold and tell some lie claiming I opposed all immigrants, even though I explicitly stated criminals who broke in, which is obvious to anyone who can read. In full context, I also said statistically it is more likely for criminals to continue breaking laws than it is for Europe to return to WWII, which is also obvious to anyone who looks at the statistics and reads the news. Considering how obvious it is, I would even say it's a statement of Fact with a capital F.

So back to the other comparisons, because we're going to do an exercise in logic here: if you won't moderate people who talk about "white racist" conspiracy theories because "well, he specified white racists and wasn't talking about ALL white people," then you must also overturn this message following the same logic. If it IS moddable to complain about "white racists," expect a lot of marked messages and you can explain to people - on a political board where they are used to talking about this stuff all the time - why they can't oppose racists or criminals anymore. If it's going to be the usual illogical position where all of this is ignored and I'm moderated exclusively, I'm just going to take it as further proof that mods are biased and target users for ridiculous things like this.

A Mod/Admin said on 1/13/2019 7:36:25 PM:
Yes, blatantly racist posts such as equating refugees as criminals does generally get your account warned or suspended. Beyond that, you're not allowed to dispute the severity of a moderation anyway.

You said on 1/14/2019 12:04:41 AM:
As usual and as predicted, all you people do is lie about me. I have supported refugees multiple times on that board and have said nothing against them in this message. It was either your lies or your own racist assumptions that were made here, either way it's no wonder why you don't want your account name tied to such terrible decisions. Please refrain from harassing and lying about me in the future.

I've challenged him to a public debate on my board.

[Tails82]

So just an update on the things that went down in the past month:

- I never received a response to that dispute, for 30 days. It purged without a response.

- SBAllen has been pressured to close down my community board because I didn't moderate "offensive" messages fast enough (I was on at 9:30pm that night and this was apparently too late for them). The "offensive" messages in question that required such urgency were an nkl and a guy who said he wanted to harm a fictional anime waifu.

Meanwhile on CE:

-I get a new moderation because the wildly-unpopular Error1355 was at it again defending a wildly-unpopular moderation. The user in question was moderated for reporting on the Smollett hoax, which some mod didn't want to accept was a hoax (but are they going to overturn it? No). As time went on it devolved into the usual personal attacks, so I came in with this:

Guys, I know the personal stuff is tempting and honestly a low-hanging target, but this is not the place for it.

How about focusing on the fact that Error is a Gamefaqs mod? I think that just says it all in itself.

Warned for "trolling"

A Mod/Admin said on 2/23/2019 11:00:27 PM:
Your unhealthy obsession and harassment of certain mods needs to stop.

You said on 2/24/2019 4:59:58 AM:
You just warned me off a clear history for telling people not to attack a mod's personal life. I don't think I would call other people unhealthy if I were you.

[Tails82]

A Mod/Admin said on 2/24/2019 5:45:51 AM:
And you just attacked the mods again, so pot meet kettle. And you're misunderstanding how moderations work if you think a clean history exempts you from harsher punishments. Certain violations warrant a Warning or higher even with a clean history and your continued, targeted harassment of the mod staff would be one of those instances. You don't like the mods, we get it, the whole site gets it, but you need to keep it to yourself and not try to inject your personal opinions about us everywhere you go.

You said on 2/25/2019 6:53:25 PM:
I think it would be helpful to lay down some basic definitions here:

First, this is a paper-thin trolling moderation, not a harassment moderation.

Second, harassment means following someone around 24/7 or close to it, in ways that are detrimental or threatening. Once a month at most, or so far back that you have to rely on memory for the last time it happened, is not a sign of harassment. It's also not harassment just to be on the same board as someone else, or people would be getting warned just for responding to anybody.

Third, trolling is not a difference in opinion and it DEFINITELY is not a statement of fact. "Error is a gamefaqs mod" is a statement of fact.

Fourth, it's not "obsessive" or "unhealthy" to tell other people to avoid attacking a mod personally.

Finally, I didn't attack a mod, I defended myself. But if you consider that an attack and a "pot meet kettle" equal exchange, then please let me know when that mod is getting warned for "harassment" as well. Or, we can just drop the charade and accept that this moderation was an overreaction to a message that was a very tame statement of fact, which also told people to avoid the personal harassment of others.

[Tails82]

A Mod/Admin said on 2/25/2019 11:14:49 PM:
You've been stalking and harassing the moderator in question for literally years. You should probably quit doing so, or at the very least stop pretending to be surprised when you get warned for doing the same thing over and over and over and over again.

You said on 2/26/2019 11:40:08 PM:
I will address the actual message first, because that's what you're actually supposed to be looking at. Unless mods think that their reputation is that terrible, calling a Gamefaqs moderator a Gamefaqs moderator is not trolling, it's a statement of fact. Also, I told someone that they may find things funny about a guy's personal life (which he publicly shared), but insulting him over it is not the right way to go about things. What is wrong with this message? Because I disagreed with Error in the past, and simply mentioned his name now because he was in the topic? That's it?

Outside this message and onto your outside baggage, has anyone asked Error how he feels? He follows me on twitter. He has never asked me to stop responding to him (and I don't follow him around - I posted in a hot topic that had a lot of people responding to him, others who WERE insulting him, and I asked them not to act like that and keep any complaints about mods only to relevant things that they do as mods, so sue me). When someone asked him about a post I made a long time ago, Error actually said it was funny and didn't mind it. He hasn't changed that position as far as I'm aware, maybe he has but I don't "stalk" him nearly as much as you think or I would've known about it and said okay.

So I don't follow, I do complain about Error from time to time (not as the initiator, just in response to things he's done to me), complaints are not harassment. And I think I'm the one with a valid complaint of harassment, if you can call it that, when I see a long string of my topics just get locked on me without an explanation, or when I'm on my community board one morning and suddenly notice my account get hit for something small which was never in my queue, which later gets downgraded (I'm assuming by our very own admin) because yes, it was a big overreach - much like this moderation. And yes, I am going to complain and defend myself when things like that happen to me.

A Mod/Admin said on 3/1/2019 2:59:05 PM:
You didn't just "call a Gamefaqs moderator a Gamefaqs moderator". You immediately followed it up with "I think that just says it all in itself."

As stated, you've been carrying a torch for Error for many years at this point. There will be absolutely no leniency given at this point when it comes to you posting about him.

[Tails82]

"Mods secretly love this place." [my board]

You think so?

I dunno man. A former mod once said that my complaints about the mods were because I'm homo for them but they don't swing that way (a comment which was never modded, btw). I'm not going to assume that's happening the other way either, even though it's a common stereotype. I think they don't like anything they don't control.

Eyy lookie that! So you can be a "homophobe" mod on Gamefaqs and the guy who complains about it gets moderated. That's the ticket, guys! Become a Gamefaqs mod and you can break any of the so-called rules* you want!

*"Offensive" is not a rule on Gamefaqs, it's a joke

[Tails82]

A Mod/Admin said on 3/2/2019 9:34:52 PM:
Use of offensive slurs is not allowed on GameFAQs.

You allowed the mod to do it though, which is why I brought it up in the first place.

[Tails82]

"Stupid laws in your home state?"

www.breitbart.com/politics/2015/09/22/handicap-advocates-say-old-handicapped-signs-discriminatory/

NY jumped on this bandwagon - look! He's leaning forward!

Some Democrat-connected contractors did pretty well for themselves on this hole-digging job.

Oh, and there's also the little fact that they rush to ban things like straws and plastic, but the Democrats believe that a guy can shoot a pregnant woman on 5th avenue, carve the baby out and eat it and not face criminal charges for that. We are run by a gang of criminals, not a political party.

15kl trolling for yet another opinion that differs from some dumbass mod.

[Tails82]

"There are a lot of things that could cause a rise in overturns. For example, we always have a rise around a new mod batch as they learn."

I guess outrage is a learned art. Maybe the site would be better off listening to the newer mods.

Also, just as an aside to any mod out there, feel free to reach out to me. I protect my sources!

nkl mod discretion