Tails82
Lord of Terror++
Loyal Vassal
still...sipping?
Posts: 34,371
|
Post by Tails82 on Mar 1, 2014 14:35:48 GMT -5
What are anti-rape laws for?
|
|
|
|
Post by Chromeo on Mar 1, 2014 14:44:06 GMT -5
I think that is (as usual) a moronic comparison.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pyro ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ✔ on Mar 1, 2014 14:44:25 GMT -5
What are anti-rape laws for? El Khemis is a town and commune in Djelfa Province, Algeria. According to the 1998 census it has a population of 4,769.[1] |
|
Tails82
Lord of Terror++
Loyal Vassal
still...sipping?
Posts: 34,371
|
Post by Tails82 on Mar 1, 2014 15:08:21 GMT -5
Ally disagreed with limits placed on someone's sex drive. Those laws are limits, comparison valid.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pyro ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ✔ on Mar 1, 2014 15:24:43 GMT -5
No you're comparing something someone does alone with something that involves someone else without their permission. There is no comparison. Don't be stupid. You're smarter than that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pyro ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ✔ on Mar 2, 2014 5:08:08 GMT -5
1 total: 1  |
|
|
|
Post by Pyro ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ✔ on Mar 4, 2014 5:08:26 GMT -5
3
total: 3
|
|
Tails82
Lord of Terror++
Loyal Vassal
still...sipping?
Posts: 34,371
|
Post by Tails82 on Mar 4, 2014 8:49:45 GMT -5
What makes rape bad?
|
|
|
|
Post by Chromeo on Mar 4, 2014 11:18:13 GMT -5
Heellll-o, exploitable quote!
|
|
Tails82
Lord of Terror++
Loyal Vassal
still...sipping?
Posts: 34,371
|
Post by Tails82 on Mar 4, 2014 12:20:12 GMT -5
Well I would say that it is a severe violation of bodily and spiritual integrity, though I don't know what standing an atheist would have to criticize it. They argue sex is like drinking a glass of water, not a big deal, then rape wouldn't be either. But if we were to agree that rape seriously violates someone, as an affront to God and man, what does it say about someone who violates themselves and others willingly?
|
|
|
|
Post by kode54 on Mar 5, 2014 1:07:07 GMT -5
As I do not answer to any authority which considers masturbation Wrong, I do not consider it a violation of my person when I am doing it willingly. I would certainly consider it a violation if someone forced themselves on me without my personal consent.
But I guess you don't care what a person thinks unless their opinion aligns with an invisible friend in the sky that they totally did not make up just to drive their point harder.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pyro ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ✔ on Mar 5, 2014 4:54:40 GMT -5
4 total: 4  |
|
Tails82
Lord of Terror++
Loyal Vassal
still...sipping?
Posts: 34,371
|
Post by Tails82 on Mar 5, 2014 8:24:42 GMT -5
What is sex for? A set purpose. A purpose set in nature by design. So we can say rape is a violation of natural law. Atheists can say personal opinion? That they find it icky? Does it become right when you change your mind?
|
|
|
|
Post by kode54 on Mar 5, 2014 22:08:47 GMT -5
Just because someone doesn't use their invisible sky friend as an excuse to make laws does not mean that they enjoy changing them on a whim. Actually, the only laws the godless heathens have been changing are laws that were first devised by those blessed with schizophrenia visions of otherworldly beings who tell them what's right and what's wrong. Naturally, nobody believes the same thing happened to Joseph Smith, because he lived within a time of recorded history. If he had lived over 2000 years ago, separated from our time by a period of unrecorded history, and all we knew of him and his religion was told by word of mouth and the recordkeeping of someone who totally has no interest in swaying the population to follow them, then perhaps we would be more likely to have a much larger LDS (they wouldn't call it that if it happened in ancient history) following today.
Of course, I'm sure they'd still be just as manipulative either way, telling their congregation which way to vote, telling the general public scare stories so they'll vote that way too, etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pyro ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ✔ on Mar 6, 2014 4:51:07 GMT -5
5
total: 5
|
|
Spinning round and round like the deadly hands of a radium clock. 
