|
Post by Laharls_Wrath on Nov 15, 2011 8:37:20 GMT -5
well it needs to be something that fits which means it needs to be a replacement keyboard or one of a few models of laptops or something sketchier off ebay but this logitech usb one will work for the time being, although I eventually want something to put back in the spot where the old keyboard was essentially either going to be this or something most likely off ebay from a link from someone on that forum I lurk for info on things like taking my pc apart linked to saying "this works" or possibly one off the g5 series (might not be g5, have to double check) because iirc they're the same size and compatible and all that
|
|
|
Post by thewave on Nov 15, 2011 13:53:27 GMT -5
Thank you, Wave and you lot have just demonstrated how most people will believe anything if it's told by someone famous and seemingly smart. >_> Wut. I'm not believing anyone who's just famous and seemingly smart. I mean, I believe in myself, yet I'm not famous and that smart! ...Okay, that was a bad lie, joke and example, but still. I've never heard of Schrödinger until a month ago, and I just think the theory is interesting. In fact, I had completely forgotten it was from Schrödinger until now. I just referred to it as "The dead and alive cat". In fact, I never said I believed the whole Schrödinger's cat, it's just very interesting. It made me thinking of possible answers (of course I got nowhere). I searched around what other people were thinking and what their possible answers were. It was really interesting what kind of theories are about the Schrödinger's cat. ...And that's it. Beside that I just stand my usual neutral ground. I don't believe it, nor do I disbelieve it. It's just interesting, nothing else. TL;DR Stop being a dick Nitro, and respect others opinion
|
|
|
Post by Chromeo on Nov 15, 2011 14:05:50 GMT -5
I don't respect opinions when they're wrong >_>
|
|
|
Post by thewave on Nov 15, 2011 14:15:12 GMT -5
So it's wrong to find the Schrödinger interesting?
|
|
|
Post by Chromeo on Nov 15, 2011 14:18:21 GMT -5
It's wrong for you to call me narrow minded for saying the experiment is ridiculous which it is.
|
|
|
Post by thewave on Nov 15, 2011 14:50:23 GMT -5
It's wrong of you to call me narrow minded for saying the experiment is ridiculous which it is. Fix'd. Anyway, you're the one going all "It's a stupid experiment because you can't see if it's dead or alive", I'm actually trying to reason with it. Sure you may not like it, and I don't care, it's not like I expect everyone to like the theory. But geez, try to have a decent arguing without being all butt hurt like "it's stupid people only like it because the guy is famous".
|
|
|
Post by Mastery on Nov 15, 2011 18:59:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Laharls_Wrath on Nov 15, 2011 21:09:59 GMT -5
It's wrong for you to call me narrow minded for saying the experiment is ridiculous which it is. I didn't call you narrow minded for the experiment I called you narrow minded for being narrow minded and it's still fun to think about philosophically, the same way as the whole thing about the tree falling in the forest
|
|
Tails82
Lord of Terror++
Loyal Vassal
still...sipping?
Posts: 34,340
|
Post by Tails82 on Nov 15, 2011 21:36:46 GMT -5
Why wouldn't the tree make a sound?
|
|
|
Post by Laharls_Wrath on Nov 15, 2011 21:44:01 GMT -5
How can you be sure?
|
|
Tails82
Lord of Terror++
Loyal Vassal
still...sipping?
Posts: 34,340
|
Post by Tails82 on Nov 15, 2011 22:29:05 GMT -5
Because it does. >_>
|
|
|
Post by Laharls_Wrath on Nov 15, 2011 22:49:59 GMT -5
Well I say this tree wont, prove me otherwise
|
|
Tails82
Lord of Terror++
Loyal Vassal
still...sipping?
Posts: 34,340
|
Post by Tails82 on Nov 15, 2011 22:56:49 GMT -5
Aw you're just a sound atheist.
|
|
|
Post by Pyro ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ ✔ on Nov 15, 2011 23:00:10 GMT -5
People who think it won't make a sound don't understand basic physics.
|
|
|
Post by Chromeo on Nov 16, 2011 7:35:44 GMT -5
People who think it won't make a sound don't understand basic physics. Indeed. It's not philosophy, it's dumb.
|
|